Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Stewart v. State

Stewart v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 19, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
879 S.W.2d 571; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 670; 1994 WL 133110 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Stewart v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant pled guilty to selling a controlled substance and was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law *572appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find a written opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑