Cross v. State
Cross v. State
879 S.W.2d 617; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 745; 1994 WL 174407
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cross v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). An opinion in this case would have no prece-dential value; therefore we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.