Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Biermann v. Halel

Biermann v. Halel
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 26, 1994 · Crahan, Crane, Karohl
879 S.W.2d 797; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229; 1994 WL 384700 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Biermann v. Halel

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order sustaining Defendants’ motion to dismiss their common law action for personal injuries. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record and find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.