Jumper v. State
Jumper v. State
880 S.W.2d 584; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023; 1994 WL 270472
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Jumper v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Kevin Jumper, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.