Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Wilson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 30, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Grimm

882 S.W.2d 764; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1383; 1994 WL 463895 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.