Varrin v. State
Varrin v. State
882 S.W.2d 766; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1391; 1994 WL 463913
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Varrin v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Aan J. Varrin, appeals from the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.