Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

State v. Silinzy

State v. Silinzy
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 13, 1994 · Crandall, Crane, Crist
883 S.W.2d 112; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1442; 1994 WL 493940 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Silinzy

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree assault- and armed criminal action. We affirm.

Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.-25(b). A memorandum setting forth the rea*113sons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑