Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Ball v. State

Ball v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 26, 1994 · Ahrens, Karohl, Simon
884 S.W.2d 62; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217; 1994 WL 384701 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Ball v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no pree-*63edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑