Haferkamp v. State
Haferkamp v. State
886 S.W.2d 114; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1384; 1994 WL 463902
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Haferkamp v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Ernestine Haferkamp, appeals from the St. Louis County Circuit Court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.