Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Hanson v. Carroll-Kehoe

Hanson v. Carroll-Kehoe
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 25, 1994 · Ahrens, Karohl, Simon
886 S.W.2d 163; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645; 1994 WL 583916 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hanson v. Carroll-Kehoe

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and trial court judgment for defendant in a negligence case. The verdict is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transp. Comm’n, 859 S.W.2d 681, 692[15, 16] (Mo. banc 1993).

An opinion reciting the detaüed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

*164We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.