Boclair v. State
Boclair v. State
889 S.W.2d 65; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663; 1994 WL 583913
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Boclair v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Curtis Boelair (“Defendant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.