Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Caruthers v. State

Caruthers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 22, 1994 · Gaertner, Grimm, Reinhard
891 S.W.2d 476; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1815; 1994 WL 652493 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Caruthers v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.