Caruthers v. State
Caruthers v. State
891 S.W.2d 476; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1815; 1994 WL 652493
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Caruthers v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.