Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Prosser v. State

Prosser v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 13, 1994 · Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard
892 S.W.2d 685; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1917; 1994 WL 693495 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Prosser v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.