Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

State v. Lawyer

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 10, 1995 · Ahrens, Karohl, Simon

890 S.W.2d 419; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 13 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Lawyer (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals convictions on two counts assault first degree and two counts armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We hold the claims of trial court error are without merit and the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judg*420ment affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.