Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

State v. McDaniels

State v. McDaniels
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 7, 1995 · Pudlowski, Smith, White
891 S.W.2d 901; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 205 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. McDaniels

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction by a jury of possession of PCP, a controlled substance and his eleven year imprisonment sentence as a prior and persistent offender. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. The points raised by defendant on appeal are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The findings of fact by the trial court on the Rule 29.15 motion are not clearly eiToneous and support the trial court’s judgment. No error of law appears. Affir-mance is made in compliance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Defendant’s motion for remand is denied.

Judgments affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.