Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Maddipati v. Bucaro

Maddipati v. Bucaro
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 21, 1995 · Pudlowski, Smith, White
892 S.W.2d 825; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307; 1995 WL 73389 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Maddipati v. Bucaro

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from the entry of a summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor in plaintiffs’ suit for unlawful detainer. Defendants’ only defense is a challenge to the validity of plaintiffs’ title. Issues relating to title cannot be interposed as a defense in unlawful detainer cases. Meier v. Thorpe, 822 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App. 1992) [1]; Sec. 534.210 RSMol994. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.