Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

State v. Carson

State v. Carson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 28, 1995 · Crahan, Crandall, Reinhard
894 S.W.2d 212; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346; 1995 WL 78268 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Carson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.