Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Neistat v. Jacobs

Neistat v. Jacobs
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 18, 1995 · Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard
896 S.W.2d 723; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 759; 1995 WL 225445 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Neistat v. Jacobs

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Fred and Carol Neistat, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff, Richard Jacobs, on his petition for negligence and breach of contract. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.