Rowe v. Cotitta
Rowe v. Cotitta
897 S.W.2d 237; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 916; 1995 WL 263976
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Rowe v. Cotitta
Opinion of the Court
Loretta Rowe appeals the trial court’s judgment that C-XXXII Properties is not obligated to pay Rowe the balance due on a promissory note on which C-XXXII defaulted. C-XXXII had used the note to buy property from Rowe. The court concluded that C-XXXII owed Rowe nothing more after it returned the property to her. We affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.