Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Rummel v. Hockensmith

Rummel v. Hockensmith
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 23, 1995 · Pudlowski, Smith, White
901 S.W.2d 281; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 945; 1995 WL 310742 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Rummel v. Hockensmith

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order for summary judgment against their legal malpractice claims. We affirm. Because we do not discern any precedential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order, The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.