Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Maul v. Bi-State Development Agency

Maul v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 11, 1995 · Ahrens, Karohl, Simon
902 S.W.2d 368; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278; 1995 WL 406329 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Maul v. Bi-State Development Agency

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Julie Maul, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Bi-State Development Agency, in an action for personal injuries she sustained when struck by an automobile after disembarking from defendant’s bus.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, set*369ting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.