Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Newbill v. Newbill

Newbill v. Newbill
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 20, 1995 · Pudlowski, Smith, White
903 S.W.2d 576; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1154; 1995 WL 365050 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Newbill v. Newbill

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Brooks Newbill, appeals from the trial court’s order modifying the parties’ decree of dissolution and awarding respondent attorneys’ fees. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Respondent’s motion to supplement the record on appeal, motion regarding mootness and motion to strike portions of appellant’s reply brief are denied. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.