Ripley v. Valley R-6 School District
Ripley v. Valley R-6 School District
903 S.W.2d 647; 1995 WL 434294
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Ripley v. Valley R-6 School District
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Valley R-6 School District and Cal Tiefe-nauer appeal from a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Washington County finding that Tiefenauer failed to exercise the
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), and deny Respondent’s request for attorney fees for frivolous appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.