Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Carwell v. Marshalls of Sunset Hills

Carwell v. Marshalls of Sunset Hills
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 30, 1995 · Ahrens, Grimm, Karohl
904 S.W.2d 284; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Carwell v. Marshalls of Sunset Hills

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued Marshalls of Sunset Hills and Melville Corporation (Retailer), Shore-break, Inc. (Manufacturer), and R & S Trading Company, Inc. (Wholesaler).

After making the purchase, plaintiff discovered that B.U.M. labels had been sewn over “I.O.U.” labels, another brand of sweatshirt. Plaintiff alleges I.O.U. sweatshirts are worth $5.00 less than B.U.M., so he sustained $15.00 actual damages. His suit alleged fraud, seeking actual and punitive damages.

The trial court sustained Manufacturer’s and Wholesaler’s motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Thereafter, it granted Retailer’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*285The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.