Lomax v. State
Lomax v. State
907 S.W.2d 333; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1665; 1995 WL 579993
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Lomax v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We affirm dismissal of defendant-movant Lomax’s Rule 29.15 motion because it was filed out of time, Malone v. State, 798 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Mo. banc 1990) cert. denied 500 U.S. 929, 111 S.Ct. 2044, 114 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991), and was addressed to deficiencies of appellate counsel, matters not within the rule. Reuscher v. State, 887 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo. banc 1994).
We affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.