ORDER

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction by jury of burglary in the first degree. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs and record of the case and find defendant’s arguments are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).