Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Vaughan v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Vaughan v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 17, 1995 · Gaertner, Rhodes, Smith
908 S.W.2d 168; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1721 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Vaughan v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Rolf Vaughan, brought suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., to recover for injuries he sustained while employed by Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company. Plaintiff now appeals from an adverse jury verdict. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal for Plain- • *169tiffs noneompliance with Rule 84.04(c) is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.