State v. Bailey
State v. Bailey
908 S.W.2d 381; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1809
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Bailey
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In this consolidated action, Defendant appeals from his conviction of second degree burglary and stealing, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.