Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

State v. Carroll

State v. Carroll
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 26, 1995 · Crahan, Crandall, Dowd
910 S.W.2d 314; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606; 1995 WL 565004 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Carroll

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his judgment' of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine base), in violation of § 195.211, RSMo 1991. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.