Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Hemphill v. State

Hemphill v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 26, 1995 · Karohl, Reinhard, White
910 S.W.2d 319; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610; 1995 WL 565038 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hemphill v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.