Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995

Beishline v. State

Beishline v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 21, 1995 · Ahrens, Reinhard, Rhodes
913 S.W.2d 344; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1899; 1995 WL 686577 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Beishline v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.