Streett v. State
Streett v. State
914 S.W.2d 51; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 131; 1996 WL 21253
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Streett v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Toby Streett appeals his conviction for violating an ex parte order of protection. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and complains that his due process rights were violated because the state did not make an opening statement at trial. We affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential purpose in publishing a written opinion, we issue this summary order. We include for the parties a memorandum explaining the basis for our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.