Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Duke v. Vickers

Duke v. Vickers
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 13, 1996 · Dowd, Karohl, Reinhard
914 S.W.2d 869; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 224; 1996 WL 56265 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Duke v. Vickers

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Client appeals from a judgment for attorney in client’s action for refund of attorney’s fees. Client filed an action in small claims court for a refund of $1,500.00 of $2,000.00 client paid to attorney. Attorney counterclaimed for $620.00, and the small claims court found for attorney on both claims and ordered client to pay $620.00 to attorney. Following a trial de novo, the court entered judgment for attorney on client’s claim and for client on attorney’s counterclaim. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.