Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Nave

State v. Nave
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 20, 1996 · Ellis, Hanna, Spinden
915 S.W.2d 794; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 251; 1996 WL 69366 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Nave

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Nave appeals his conviction of second degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He accuses the trial court of erroneously denying his motion for a psychiatric examination and his trial counsel of incompetent representation for not filing a timely notice of intent to rely on a mental disease as a defense. We do not find merit in these claims and affirm the judgments of conviction and denial of post-conviction relief. Because we do not discern any *795jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). We have issued to the parties a memorandum explaining the basis for our order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.