Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Mahan v. Skyline Corp.

Mahan v. Skyline Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 9, 1996 · Parrish, Prewitt, Shrum
916 S.W.2d 401; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 202; 1996 WL 56549 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Mahan v. Skyline Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Judgment was entered against Defendant D & D Motors Co., Inc., due to its default, and summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant Skyline Corporation. Plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant Skyline Corporation asserts that summary judgment was correct “because appellants’ claims are based upon an excessive, ambient level of formaldehyde inside their manufactured home and such claims are preempted by the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standard Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 5401-5426, and the regulations promulgated therefrom by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 24 C.F.R. § 3280.308, et seq.”

The exact issue was presented to the Eastern District of this Court in Mizner v. North River Homes, Inc., 913 S.W.2d 23 (Mo.App. 1995). The Court determined that the personal injury claim asserted was not preempted. Application for transfer of that case to the Missouri Supreme Court was sustained by the Supreme Court on September 19, 1995, and the matter transferred there. Because of the general interest and importance of the question presented, on September 25, 1995, this cause was transferred by this District to the Missouri Supreme Court, under Rule 83.02.

On January 23, 1996, the Supreme Court retransferred Mizner to the Eastern District and retransferred this matter to this District. Thereafter, on February 5,1996, the Eastern District readopted its previous opinion in Mizner. We agree with the logic and l’esult of that opinion.

Summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

SHRUM, C.J., and PARRISH, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.