State v. Bracken
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Antoine L. Bracken v. Dave Dormire (8th Cir. 2001)
- Antoine Bracken v. Dave Dormire (8th Cir. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, Antoine Bracken, appeals from Ms judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, for second degree murder and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the denial of Ms Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
As to defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opirnon would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Defendant’s convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.