Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Speigelman v. University City School District

Speigelman v. University City School District
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 5, 1996 · Gaertner, Russell, Smith
917 S.W.2d 628; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 370 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Speigelman v. University City School District

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cecile Speigelman, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis dismissing her petition against respondent, University City School District, for breach of contract. We affirm.1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided solely for the use of the parties.

. Respondent school district’s motion to supplement the record and to dismiss the appeal is herein denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑