Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Stanfield

State v. Stanfield
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 13, 1996 · Dowd, Karohl, Reinhard
918 S.W.2d 264; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 223; 1996 WL 56252 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Stanfield

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted following a bench trial of one count of harassment, § 565.090, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him to a one year prison term but suspended execution of the sentence and placed defendant on probation for two years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without *265merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.