Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Hubbard

State v. Hubbard
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 20, 1996 · Dowd, Karohl, Reinhard
918 S.W.2d 265; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 279; 1996 WL 70209 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Hubbard

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a class X offender to a twenty-five year prison term. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judg*266ment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.