Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Holmes v. State

Holmes v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 27, 1996 · Dowd, Karohl, Reinhard
918 S.W.2d 282; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 323; 1996 WL 80909 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Holmes v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.