Woodward v. State
Woodward v. State
918 S.W.2d 302; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 382; 1996 WL 104434
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Woodward v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This court previously decided movant’s direct appeal. State v. Woodward, 895 S.W.2d 264 (Mo.App.E.D. 1995). The transcript for the direct appeal was filed on March 11, 1994. On April 24, 1995, over one month after we decided the direct appeal movant filed a pro se motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Accordingly, the pro se motion was untimely. Rule 24.035(b). The motion court dismissed the motion. The dismissal was mandatory. “The time limitations contained in Rules 24.035 and 29.15 are valid and mandatory.” Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). The dismissal is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.