Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 2, 1996 · Gaertner, Russell, Smith
918 S.W.2d 404; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 558; 1996 WL 148270 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Bowden v. Parnell Menard Corp.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Kevin Bowden, Patricia Bow-den, and Ted Schmitz (“homeowners”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County finding for respondent, Parnell Menard Corporation (“seller-builder”), on homeowners’ claims of breach of implied warranties of fitness for purpose. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been provided solely for the use of the parties involved.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.