Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Nazemi v. Normand

Nazemi v. Normand
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 23, 1996 · Gaertner, Russell, Smith
920 S.W.2d 193; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 696; 1996 WL 192037 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Nazemi v. Normand

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mike Nazemi appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Leila Normand, on a claim for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. We affirm. Respondent’s motion to dismiss and for damages for frivolous appeal is denied.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.