Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Cates v. State

Cates v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 12, 1996 · Grimm, Karohl, Reinhard
920 S.W.2d 563; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 380; 1996 WL 103899 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cates v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.