Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Goette v. Masp, Inc.

Goette v. Masp, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 26, 1996 · Crahan, Crandall, Dowd
922 S.W.2d 812; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 478; 1996 WL 133290 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Goette v. Masp, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the circuit court’s denial of their motion nunc pro tunc and their motion for Rehearing or to Alter or Amend Judgment. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.