Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Baldridge v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A.

Baldridge v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 18, 1996 · Crahan, Crandall, Dowd
924 S.W.2d 59; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1047; 1996 WL 330871 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Baldridge v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N.A.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen A. Baldridge (“Baldridge”) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment awarding Respondent costs and attorney’s fees under Rule 90.18(b). We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

We further grant Respondent’s motion for costs and attorney’s fees on this appeal pursuant to Rule 90.18(c) and Rule 84.21.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.