Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Everhart

State v. Everhart
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 2, 1996 · Breckenridge, Smith, Ulrich
924 S.W.2d 618; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1179; 1996 WL 363365 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Everhart

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from convictions of forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1992, and forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo Supp. 1992, and from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Ever-hart alleges reversible error in the denial of a mistrial when a witness suggested a prior police photograph was used in a photographic line-up and when a juror slept through a *619portion of the cross-examination of the complaining -witness. He also claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failure to object to the prosecutor’s reference to him as a “human predator” in closing argument.

The judgments of the trial court and the motion court are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.