Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Young v. State

Young v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 23, 1996 · Breckenridge, Fenner, Ulrich
925 S.W.2d 505; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296; 1996 WL 408728 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Young v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Adam Young appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion because *506trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to allow him to testify.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.