Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Moye

State v. Moye
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 13, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
926 S.W.2d 723; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417; 1996 WL 453423 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Moye

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Moye, Jr., appeals the judgment of conviction for stealing a credit card in violation of RSMo § 570.030.3(3)(c) (1994) entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury trial, and appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We *724further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.