Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Little v. State

Little v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 13, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
926 S.W.2d 724; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402; 1996 WL 453427 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Little v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.